I had given word to continue to follow the issues related to waste management, although I think this is a minefield, but I am here to update you on my new initiatives.
As some will remember the city council of 10 July 2008, on the occasion of the approval of the statement of operations of the financial year 2007, intervened to comment on some accounting data found on the documentation used by the company providing the service to the issue of invoices (Annexes 1 and 2). At that time, the junta I formulated some requests for clarification and any advice suggested some elements of reflection on the quality service, compared to a cost so high, the administration thought of not having to provide any response to its citizens. The concerns voiced publicly by a town councilor, a chapter on the expenditure of approximately € 700,000.00, a figure which, in my opinion there is no justification, since the service provided and the conditions of deterioration and where pay dirt in the streets of our country, have not been answered.
This administration, very distracted and engaged almost exclusively in extra-territorial activities, evidently considers his troublesome when administered as an unpleasant turn offices "competent" to expose the anomalies of the service, when protesting the exorbitant bill of waste, when you complain about the dirt roads dotted with dog excrement, when protesting the beds covered with weeds only when clamoring to remove the sign displayed at the entrance of the village on which the rule mockingly written "City of flowers".
They do not have a right to know how to spend their money, they have the right to get the answers you are just annoying bores which are only good for pressing.
And then I tried to further our common request in writing and through the offices in charge, making these the same questions occurred in the municipal council (Annex 3)
probably my questions have not been well understood since the questions raised were directed to the relevant departments in my town and not to any other agency.
offices surveyed, as well as to consider myself an emeritus naive enough to remember the obligations of Cadosa, I have indicated nothing more than they already suspected (Annex 4). That is to say that the municipality does not exercise any type of check on service and appropriateness of invoices that the company providing the service presented for payment, pays them without batting an eyelid.
With the bill in December 2007, the company providing the service, perhaps, having noticed invoicing for disproportionate numbers during the year, has reversed the invoice amount of € 46,770.49 including VAT, this confirms the fact that the municipality does not exercise any control, since the transfer is not accompanied by any notes that you report any action of the municipality. I turned to
Cadosa (Dora Sangone Environment Consortium) organization which, among other tasks, would have a duty to exercise its monitoring of compliance with the business activities of the companies providing the service, as required by technical specifications, reformulating even at this the same requests to the municipality (Annex 5).
by return e-mail, Cadosa sent me a note, for information with which it is aimed at Acsel Spa for more information as well as can be seen from the object (Annex 6)
At this point I wonder if to answer my questions that this organization should exercise control activity needs to turn its control to acquire elements of knowledge, what controls does he do?
I hope that upon these questions at the end someone will be able to answer timely, convincing and documented, they are considered by some too impertinent usually made by "nuisance" that can reassure Condovesi, which does not explain how you can reach the Such high costs for a service frankly very poor.
As some will remember the city council of 10 July 2008, on the occasion of the approval of the statement of operations of the financial year 2007, intervened to comment on some accounting data found on the documentation used by the company providing the service to the issue of invoices (Annexes 1 and 2). At that time, the junta I formulated some requests for clarification and any advice suggested some elements of reflection on the quality service, compared to a cost so high, the administration thought of not having to provide any response to its citizens. The concerns voiced publicly by a town councilor, a chapter on the expenditure of approximately € 700,000.00, a figure which, in my opinion there is no justification, since the service provided and the conditions of deterioration and where pay dirt in the streets of our country, have not been answered.
This administration, very distracted and engaged almost exclusively in extra-territorial activities, evidently considers his troublesome when administered as an unpleasant turn offices "competent" to expose the anomalies of the service, when protesting the exorbitant bill of waste, when you complain about the dirt roads dotted with dog excrement, when protesting the beds covered with weeds only when clamoring to remove the sign displayed at the entrance of the village on which the rule mockingly written "City of flowers".
They do not have a right to know how to spend their money, they have the right to get the answers you are just annoying bores which are only good for pressing.
And then I tried to further our common request in writing and through the offices in charge, making these the same questions occurred in the municipal council (Annex 3)
probably my questions have not been well understood since the questions raised were directed to the relevant departments in my town and not to any other agency.
offices surveyed, as well as to consider myself an emeritus naive enough to remember the obligations of Cadosa, I have indicated nothing more than they already suspected (Annex 4). That is to say that the municipality does not exercise any type of check on service and appropriateness of invoices that the company providing the service presented for payment, pays them without batting an eyelid.
With the bill in December 2007, the company providing the service, perhaps, having noticed invoicing for disproportionate numbers during the year, has reversed the invoice amount of € 46,770.49 including VAT, this confirms the fact that the municipality does not exercise any control, since the transfer is not accompanied by any notes that you report any action of the municipality. I turned to
Cadosa (Dora Sangone Environment Consortium) organization which, among other tasks, would have a duty to exercise its monitoring of compliance with the business activities of the companies providing the service, as required by technical specifications, reformulating even at this the same requests to the municipality (Annex 5).
by return e-mail, Cadosa sent me a note, for information with which it is aimed at Acsel Spa for more information as well as can be seen from the object (Annex 6)
At this point I wonder if to answer my questions that this organization should exercise control activity needs to turn its control to acquire elements of knowledge, what controls does he do?
I hope that upon these questions at the end someone will be able to answer timely, convincing and documented, they are considered by some too impertinent usually made by "nuisance" that can reassure Condovesi, which does not explain how you can reach the Such high costs for a service frankly very poor.
Allegati:
