few weeks ago, I happened to watch the telecast "Environment Italy" led by Beppe Rovera, episode dedicated to issues of waste. During the program, the presenter interviewed the president of the ATO-R (Association of Turin for Setting Government Waste) Foietta architect Paul, who expressed the need to expand the landfill to Mattie, to meet the imminent saturation of other . That statement made me jump on the chair thinking, the fierce debates that saw opposing supporters of the collection of waste by the method of door to door to those who this method did not want to hear, despite being convinced, these, too, that differentiation is the only way to reduce waste to landfill. It 'good to remember that the urgent need to introduce a system pushed the door to door, as the only valid system to reduce waste to landfill, according to the mayors, was dictated by the fact that the landfill is not in question by 2011 would be able to receive anything. Another argument raised to support the previous to justify the introduction of door to door, was to make us believe that the landfill would not permit most of Mattie be further expanded. Now, in light of the statement issued by the architect Paul Foietta, which could means two things: the first is that the president of the ATO-R is able to perform miracles, then it goes without saying that it can be widened as and when it wants The second is that the mayor told us a lot of balls because they were blatantly denied by the president of the ATO-R. Then at the end of these two basic assumptions as trivial I suddenly rises a third, and so I try to offer it to you: is that with this tricks as well as from outside the area trying to get us in the landfill Mattie, even waste outside the region? I, from this whole ugly story I will not draw conclusions very risky. I leave everyone the freedom to evaluate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment